The Rest Is AI logo

← Insights

Perspective

5,000 jobs cut. How much of the story is AI?

Pawan Arya, Founder — The Rest Is AI

  • Future of work
  • Evidence
  • Responsible AI
  • Workforce

The headline

“Barclays to axe 5,000 jobs in huge blow to City as AI replaces workers”

Job losses expected this year as the bank turns to AI to make it more efficient

A headline does not establish what caused the cuts.

Source: The Standard, 22 October 2026. We examine how much of the announced reduction can be attributed to AI.

Listen

A conversation on this perspective

Listen as a short conversation — James and Sarah explore the argument from the perspective below. (about 3 minutes)

A conversation with a valued connection at Barclays prompted me to look beyond the headline.

This week the bank said it expects to reduce about 5,000 roles, and artificial intelligence is in the billing. One contrast caught my attention: alongside repeated job cuts, Barclays’ graduate hiring rose by approximately 30% between 2024 and 2025.

Three facts that complicate the story

Barclays removed approximately 5,000 roles globally through 2023, mainly in support functions. A reduction of that scale is not new to this announcement.

Its reported workforce reached about 93,000 full-time equivalents at the end of 2025, compared with 80,800 in 2019. Business changes mean this is not a like-for-like measure of hiring. The 2025 annual report also discloses a higher headcount figure, because that count is not the same as full-time equivalents.

Graduate recruitment increased from 1,224 in 2024 to 1,595 in 2025. That is roughly thirty per cent. These hiring figures predate the October 2026 announcement.

Barclays’ chief executive offered an important distinction: AI is the “icing on the cake” — not the cake. The wider modernisation programme matters. Improving infrastructure, simplifying processes and changing how the business operates is the substance. AI may speed parts of that work. It does not, on these figures, explain the whole of it.

A headline is not a cause

None of this diminishes the impact on people losing their jobs. Nor does it prove AI has no effect.

It does remind us that businesses recruit, restructure, automate, relocate and redeploy at the same time. A redundancy announcement tells us only part of that story.

Historical cuts do not rule out acceleration now. They also do not establish it. What would show that AI was speeding the trend is evidence of how staffing and hiring changed in teams using AI, relative to their workload — and how much of that change came from AI rather than other restructuring.

That evidence has to include jobs that never get advertised. Fewer vacancies, and people leaving without being replaced, will not all appear in a redundancy announcement.

AI may accelerate workforce change. The evidence should tell us how much.

The question worth asking

In your organisation, where are you seeing AI change staffing decisions — and where is it being attached to changes already underway?

The headline starts the conversation. It should not settle it.

Where these figures come from

These are Barclays’ reported figures and contemporary reporting, not TRIAI client results and not a general claim about every employer.

About 5,000 roles removed globally through 2023, mainly in support: Reuters, 8 January 2024.

1,224 graduates hired globally in 2024: Barclays PLC Annual Report 2024.

About 93,000 colleagues, and 1,595 graduates hired globally in 2025: Barclays PLC Annual Report 2025.

80,800 full-time equivalents in 2019: Barclays PLC Annual Report 2019.

The current reduction of about 5,000 roles, and the chief executive’s “icing on the cake, not the cake”: reporting on the 22 October 2026 results, including Banking Dive.

If this resonates with a conversation you're having in your own boardroom, we'd be glad to continue it.